Agnostic views & images I like

Thoughts about things on the web

Posts Tagged ‘Fox News Channel

GOP’s ongoing hypocrisies

leave a comment »

Rhetorical question mark
Image via Wikipedia

Here is a quote I found about the latest perversion of their so-called “family values“!

What it means for a lawmaker to be “pro-life” is not a rhetorical question any more. The refusal of Senate Republicans, nearly all of whom identify as pro-life, to support the 9/11 First Responders bill, also known as the James Zadroga bill—a measure that would provide funding for healthcare for firefighters, police and others who became ill as a result of their 9/11 related work—gives this question new urgency.

The shameful spectacle of antiabortion Republicans preventing, as of this writing, the possibility of even a vote for this measure before the holiday recess also makes clear that this movement has gone beyond  its historic valuing of  the life of a fetus over that of a woman.  Now it is mainly the male 9/11 workers whose lives are apparently expendable, because they cannot afford their own health care.

Let’s face it, they are anti-everything but themselves! Most of all to them human life is cheap and it is more often cheapened by their narrow-minded politics than not!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Written by BobG in Dalian & Vancouver

2010/12/21 at 16:41

Sometimes the image is everything, leaving little to interpretation

leave a comment »

TPM, which is a serious Web news site did this image snip job with a light hearted interpretation, but a deadly accurate one. So here’s the image which I snipped from HuffPo:

Ain’t  it the barking truth!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Written by BobG in Dalian & Vancouver

2010/07/30 at 20:33

I protest how CBC management has behaved in this case!

with one comment

Heather Mallick, Toronto writer, by Michelle Q...

Image via Wikipedia

I was upset this morning after reading this article in the NY Times.

Boss Is Not Amused After Columnist’s Humor Brings a Retort From Fox News

What do retorts from Fox News have to do with the posting policies of, a national Canadian web site. So I wrote this email to the CBC Ombudsman this morning:


Why has CBC management removed all links to the Heather Mallick opinion article of Sept 5 about Sarah Palin?

Opinions of all colours are expected wherever freedom of expression is suggested. Omissions or errors in editing are not a sufficient reason to remove an article from the site in my humble opinion.

I don’t particularly care what Ms. Mallick said about Governor Palin. By accepting, without blinking, the invitation to become Senator McCain’s VP running mate, Governor Palin opened the opinion floodgates. In fact, she has been quite loquacious herself on the hustings with her opinions and evasions.

But CBC management, in its craven way, has withdrawn Ms. Mallick’s opinion because it received 300+ complaints from “frothing at the mouth” supporters of Gov. Palin. They have a right to their own opinions but surely CBC management oversteps its role when it cuts links to an article posted on its national web site because of their complaints.

Free expression of opinions should be the basic rule. As a Canadian taxpayer I expect even handed treatment of opinions expressed by Canadians. Shame on you!!!

Robert Gagnon
3660 SE Marine Drive
Vancouver, Canada, V5S 4R6
biz phone 604.629.7532
cell 778.384.2121

Once again a Canadian institution gives in to the bleating complaints of extreme opinion makers in the US. What a shame, what a travesty of freedom of expression!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Written by BobG in Dalian & Vancouver

2008/10/06 at 09:02